Latest in CCSF Turnaround

Latest report from the Community College Times shows that the City College of San Francisco has identified a long-term "interim" chancellor to right the ailing college district, and appointed a "special trustee" who has the power to overturn board decisions.

SF City College Does the Math

According to an advance report in the San Francisco Chronicle, the city college's plan to balance its budget to avoid losing accreditation focuses on finances, but not so much on student learning outcomes. More to be released in October.

Two interesting perspectives on the way higher ed assessment is turning. First, a communications professor from Florida State University, is using scores of social networking popularity called Klout in course grading. Second, a professor for a massive open online course (MOOC), which includes "tens of thousands" of students, is using "peer grading" to grade papers. An article from Inside Higher Ed captures the lack of consistency and rigor in peer grading. It is a course on the history of cyberstructure and is offered by Coursera through the University of Michigan. Two points: Asking peers to apply rubrics might be a first step, although I've noted in my own research that no two instructors apply the same rubrics in the same ways. Obtaining reliable grading takes time and practice. Perhaps such training and calibration processes need to be set up online? Second, I don't see anything wrong with incorporating a real world metric to students get a feel for it, but expecting them to develop a following in the 12 to 16 weeks of a course seems a bit unrealistic.

Student Learning Outcomes Spotlighted in SF City College Accreditation Crisis

The stiff rebuke accreditors handed the City College of San Francisco for financial and leadership weaknesses also underscored the uneven progress that the college has made in establishing clear student learning outcomes. Although little reported in the media coverage, which focused on the poor business practices that triggered the threat of lost accreditation, student learning outcomes were frequently cited as another overlooked area of leadership. At best, the college varies widely in its attention to student learning outcomes, or SLOs as educators call them. Departmental responses to the new learning review template have been uneven. Some departments meet the ideal of establishing outcomes, documenting evidence that they have been met, and developing procedures to use such data to improve instruction and curriculum. But many departments do little more the offer "incomplete information" or "cursory responses," as the report termed it. Further, the accreditation review committee, which was composed of college educators from throughout the U.S., noted that "collegewide discussion of the results of SLO assessment appears to be limited." The college has attempted to address these criticisms by establishing an Academic Senate committee devoted to student learning outcomes, as described in a February 2012 college report. In addition, there is some information on progress available on the college website.

Questions Raised About Obama Community College Job Training Plan

Questions are raised about how well community college credentials secure jobs: Obama Community College Job Training Plan Is Unproven

Study Compares Results: For-Profits and Non-Profits

Researchers found graduates of for-profit schools have weaker employment outcomes and higher debt loads than students at non-profits, but the study results are considered preliminary and not the "final word" on the relative effectiveness of the two programs. A draft report is here.

Committee on Measures of Student Success

A federal education committee recommends including transfers in community college completion rates, a move expected to improve the overall completion rates of these institutions by nearly double. Community colleges generally endorsed the proposal, but the approach also drew criticism as "performance inflation." The committee's report may be found here.